“California expects to have 50 million people by 2050, we’re just shy of 40 million today,” says Steve Cliff, deputy executive 
director of California Air Resources Board (CARB). “If VMT were to grow at the same rate relative to today, it would be 
completely unsustainable?not only from a climate and <a href="http://trans24.kr/%EB%B6%80%EC%B2%9C%EC%9A%A9%EB%
8B%AC%EC%9D%B4%EC%82%AC" target="_blank">부천용달이사</a>&nbsp;air-quality perspective, but for congestion and 
fiscal obligations, too.”<br />
<br />
To reduce the state’s carbon emissions from transportation another 20 percent by 2035, CARB outlines three things that need 
to <a href="http://trans24.kr/%EC%95%88%EC%82%B0%EC%9A%A9%EB%8B%AC%EC%9D%B4%EC%82%AC" target="_blank">안
산용달이사</a>&nbsp;happen: more electric cars, greater use of less-carbon-intensive fuels, and fewer miles driven. That 
means putting about 5 million electric vehicles on the road, reducing carbon intensity of fuel by 20 percent by shifting to 
renewable sources such as hydrogen and biodiesel, and reducing driving by about 20 percent.<br />
<br />
<a href="http://trans24.kr/%EC%84%B1%EB%82%A8%EC%9A%A9%EB%8B%AC%EC%9D%B4%EC%82%AC" target="_blank">성남
용달이사</a>&nbsp;But that last part doesn’t have to sound so daunting. CARB estimates each Californian would have to 
reduce their average daily VMT by 1.6 miles?a small shift for the average 23 miles person driven daily in, say, the Bay Area. 
“This translates into something like, for [someone who commutes by car], taking transit one day a month, or riding a bike 
one day a month, or carpooling one day a month,” Cliffe says. “Those are all fairly straightforward options, but it needs to be 
convenient and it needs to not be seen as taking away or curbing people’s ability to get around.”<br />
<br />
With 46 percent of vehicle trips under three miles, reducing VMT could be sped by infrastructure and public transit 
improvements that encourage more people to take trips without a car. “Electrification is important,” says Scott Goldstein, the 
policy director of Transportation For America (T4A), a program <a href="http://trans24.kr/%EA%B3%A0%EC%96%91%EC%9A%
A9%EB%8B%AC%EC%9D%B4%EC%82%AC" target="_blank">고양용달이사</a>&nbsp;by Smart Growth America that pushes for 
more state and federal investment in public transportation. “But if you trust the scientists who say we have only 11 years to 
avoid the worst effects of climate change?not to stop it but just get it under control?then we can’t wait until 2030.”<br />
<br />
Urbanization itself reduces driving. To that end, T4A argued last week that federal funding that expands roads instead of 
improving transit undermines progress on climate policy. One study found that urban Millennials travel on average 24 miles 
per day by car, compared to 35 miles a day among rural peers. And more densely developed housing means fewer vehicles 
miles traveled per household, so rethinking land use?and resisting sprawl?has to be part of any decarbonization regime.<br />
<br />
“The easiest and cheapest <a href="http://trans24.kr/%EC%9D%98%EC%A0%95%EB%B6%80%EC%9A%A9%EB%8B%AC%EC%
9D%B4%EC%82%AC" target="_blank">의정부용달이사</a>&nbsp;thing to do is drive just a little bit less,” Goldstein says. “We 
could do that today. We could build our communities, <a href="http://trans24.kr/%EA%B4%91%EB%AA%85%EC%9A%A9%EB%
8B%AC%EC%9D%B4%EC%82%AC" target="_blank">광명용달이사</a>&nbsp;suburbs, and cities to be safer, more convenient 
for people to get around without having to drive. You can build downtowns where you only have to park once. Or breaking up 
big roads with smaller streets can reduce the length of driving trips.”<br />
<br />
<a href="http://trans24.kr/%ED%8F%89%ED%83%9D%EC%9A%A9%EB%8B%AC%EC%9D%B4%EC%82%AC" target="_blank">평택
용달이사</a>&nbsp;Reducing the number and length of trips doesn’t even have to involve a complete overhaul of suburban 
car culture overnight. Small tweaks can help. “It can be something as simple as creating more cross streets in a suburban 
development, so people don’t have to drive the whole way around,” Goldstein says. “Or a grocery store can build parking 
behind the store, away from the street, so people are more inclined to walk in rather than drive.”<br />
<br />
Electric vehicles could have an important <a href="http://trans24.kr/%EB%8F%99%EB%91%90%EC%B2%9C%EC%9A%A9%EB%
8B%AC%EC%9D%B4%EC%82%AC" target="_blank">동두천용달이사</a>&nbsp;role to play in this transition. While Minneapolis 
famously undid its restrictive single-family zoning laws in a bid to boost residential density, it is also teaming up with St. Paul 
to launch the first municipally owned electric car-sharing system in the Twin Cities, one designed to complement transit and 
lure commuters out of their cars.<br />
<br />
“We really think car-sharing will shed single-occupant, self-owned cars and postpone the buying of an <a 
href="http://trans24.kr/%EA%B3%BC%EC%B2%9C%EC%9A%A9%EB%8B%AC%EC%9D%B4%EC%82%AC" target="_blank">과천용
달이사</a>&nbsp;individual vehicle,” says Will Schroeer, the executive director of East Metro Strong, a transit advocacy 
group in the Twin Cities. “One shared vehicle takes about eight to 11 private cars off the road.”